On 28 August 1770, the General Evening Post carried an advertisement for “NEW MUSIC Just published” by Robert Bremner (1725–1789). The listing included “Periodical Overture, No. 28, composed by the Earl of Kelly for the Maid of the Mill.” The advertisement did not use the “This Day is Published” language that was Bremner’s custom when an issue was first released, so it is likely that Periodical Overture No. 28 had been in print for several weeks or months. In any event, it was to be Bremner’s last collaboration with his longtime colleague Thomas Alexander Erskine (1732–1781), the sixth Earl of Kelly (see Periodical Overtures Nos. 13, 17, and 25).
Thomas Alexander Erskine (6th Earl of Kelly (1732-1781) The Periodical Overture in 8 Parts – No. XXVIII
Key: B-flat | Movements: 3 (1) Allegro (2) Adagio ma non troppo (3) Minuet Duration: 8:56 Scoring: 2 oboes, 2 bassoons, 2 horns, 2 violins, viola, basso Originally published by Robert Bremner, London, 1770 (RISM E.778)
Purchase the score and performance materials:
The Periodical Overture No. 28 was not a new work when it appeared in Bremner’s series. In fact, it is likely that some of its purchasers had already heard it performed, since it had been composed five years earlier to serve as the overture for the pasticcio comedy The Maid of the Mill. Playwright Isaac Bickerstaffe (1733–1812) based the libretto on a very loose adaptation of Samuel Richardson’s popular novel Pamela. Like most British pasticcios of the day, the majority of the music was borrowed from earlier operatic works, but six pieces were newly composed for The Maid of the Mill: four songs by Samuel Arnold (1740–1802), an aria by Johann Christian Bach (1735–1782) (see Periodical Overtures Nos. 1, and 15), and the overture by Lord Kelly. The Maid of the Mill was the season’s chief success after its 31 January 1765 premiere at London’s Covent Garden Theatre. It then enjoyed several revivals in London, ranging clear up to the early nineteenth century. The pasticcio also traveled quite widely, with productions appearing in New York in 1769, St. Petersburg in 1772, and Jamaica in 1779.
Erskine’s overture for The Maid of the Mill enjoyed a life of its own as well. As was the case with his three earlier symphonies published by Bremner, Periodical Overture No. 28 enjoyed numerous performances in meetings of the Edinburgh Musical Society. Scholar Jenny Burchell has tabulated ten documented performances: one in 1771, two a decade later in 1781, and then seven that followed the earl’s death: two in 1782, three in 1783, and single presentations in 1784 and 1786. In a curious bit of programming, The Maid of the Mill overture was even used to precede selections from Handel’s Messiah in at least one concert, although this “unsuitable” pairing did arouse protest. The minister Charles Davy felt these “inconsistencies” were the result of a director lacking “true taste and judgement.” More evidence for the overture’s popularity was the keyboard arrangement that was published in The Piano-Forte Magazine in 1798, more than thirty years after the pasticcio’s premiere. The sustained interest in Erskine’s contribution supported the contemporary view that his music merited “vast applause” and that it was “an outstanding attraction for upper-class visitors to Edinburgh.”
From the Preface to the printed edition: Erskine’s overture amply reflects his Mannheim training with Johann Stamitz (see Periodical Overtures Nos. 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12). The B-flat major “Allegro,” in common time, opens with three hammer blows that are repeated a third higher in the second measure. Interestingly, Kelly may have influenced J. C. Bach in turn, since Bach uses the same two opening bars almost exactly at the start of his Symphony in B-flat, Op. 9/21, no. 1 (1773). After this robust, forte opening, the first theme drops in volume to prepare for a four-measure wind showcase (m. 13). Fans of Stamitz’s music would recognize the Mannheim crescendo (m. 17) that then bridges the first and second themes of the sonata form. The crescendo passage is filled with “crushed” motifs of two thirty-second notes rising to a dotted eighth, supported throughout by steady “drum 8ths.” The quieter second theme (m. 41) relaxes the intensity by using longer note values as well. The development (m. 52) opens with a motif from the first theme, and again spotlights the winds (m. 68), made more dramatic by the use of the minor mode and by short injections of the “crushed” motif in the strings and bassoon. There is a clear drive to the recapitulation (m. 84), which repeats the nuances of the exposition, including its many moments of chromaticism.
The central movement—a lyrical common-time “Adagio ma non troppo” in the dominant key of F major—loosely conforms to the binary-sonata pattern that James Hepokoski and Warren Darcy call a “Type 2 Sonata,” diagrammed as || a/I b/V a(’)/V b/I ||.[1] The horns are tacet, but Erskine continues to employ the oboes and bassoons in addition to the strings. In fact, the second period (m. 7) of the first theme showcases the oboes, followed by some delightful echo effects between the winds and strings. The oboes also introduce the second theme (m. 16), featuring a quick rise and a slower fall, and peppered with trills.
In several of the preceding Periodical Overtures, Bremner had created three-movement symphonies by eliminating minuets from his continental sources. In the case of The Maid of the Mill overture, however, Erskine’s third movement is a minuet, so Bremner retained it in this publication. Although it returns to the symphony’s B-flat tonal center and is in the customary meter, Erskine does not use the standard minuet-and-trio form. Instead, the finale is crafted as a conventional five-part rondo (A B A C A). The refrain is a graceful rising line, starting piano but repeating at forte. The first episode (m. 17) has a descending contour and plays with juxtaposed eighth notes and triplets. After the return of the refrain (m. 25), the C episode (m. 41) ushers in some increased drama by its use of a minor mode and an extended woodwind feature. After a brief moment of imitative polyphony, Erskine shifts the focus to short motifs. Another Mannheim crescendo (m. 54) adds to the episode’s intensity, but the mood lightens with the last return of A (m. 65). Overall, Erskine’s effective creativity may explain this overture’s long-term popularity; it also illustrates the “genius for composition” credited to Erskine by Burney.[2] Almost two hundred years later, British scholar Charles Cudworth reiterated that viewpoint, arguing that “after the middle of the century, the Earl of Kelly was undeniably our most gifted symphonist.”[3]
Alyson McLamore
[1] James Hepokoski and Warren Darcy, Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late-Eighteenth-Century Sonata (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 353–4.
[2] Burney, A General History of Music From the Earliest Ages to the Present Period (1789), 1018.
[3] Cudworth, “The English Symphonists of the Eighteenth Century,” 48.
